...A more complex formula?
Should this formula even appear in this article? It is just DITL-speculation approximating a "pretty picture" (as noted elsewhere) that isn't even canon in the strictest sense. We still haven't decided if we want to allow all TNGTM data - and even if we do, it should probably be noted.
Also, the formula is incomplete - definitions for a, n, f1 and f2 are missing. -- Cid Highwind 16:46, 22 Apr 2004 (CEST)